The big shift #1

rethinking communication and information design

By |2018-11-22T10:24:24+00:00October 9th, 2012|

I‘ve been pondering the gulf that lies between CRI’s way of thinking about communication and information design and the kind of thinking to be found in documents like the one I recently reviewed.

It’s tempting to say that organisations like the TGA ‘just don’t get it’ and leave it at that, but that would be too easy. Moreover, they are in the majority. Their way of thinking about communication is the commonly held view. We in the minority, having gone through a big shift in our way of thinking about communication, have some responsibility to explain the big shift and its implications for practice as well as theory in our field.

So over the coming weeks I’m going to use this blog to share with you some of CRI’s thinking on communication and information design.

I could do it historically: tell the story of how we went through the big shift. To some extent I’ve already done this—it’s available on this website. But that paper does not draw out the here-and-now practical implications of the big shift, why such documents as the TGA review strike us not only as wrong in detail, but as fundamentally missing the point. I’m therefore going to plunge in with a central point and work my way outwards.

This E-paper is for our Members. If you are a Member, please log in to read the rest. If not, please become a Member.
Students can join for as little as AU$5.00, Personal Membership AU$20.00, Organisations AU$500. You can also donate to our research fund.

One Comment

  1. Bede Sunter 10/15/2012 at 10:48 pm

    There so needs to be this debate. Experts and systems people set out to write and set the agenda. They are expert in their technical field but not expert at communication or information design. Examples: WorkCover (WorkSafe in Victoria), EPA, any government department, authority or commission you choose to mention.

Leave A Comment

Comodo SSL